492 - Adjacent Metallic Instrumentation Does Not Limit Bone Ablation When Using a Bipolar RFA Device
SIR ePoster library. Alper Sag A. 03/28/20; 289737; 492
Alan Alper Sag
REGULAR CONTENT
Login now to access Regular content available to all registered users.
Abstract
Discussion Forum (0)
Rate & Comment (0)
Poster Title: Adjacent Metallic Instrumentation Does Not Limit Bone Ablation When Using a Bipolar RFA Device
Poster number: 492
Category: Interventional Oncology: Ablation
Authors: A Sag1, W Sperduto2, W Eward3, J Ronald3, H Davis3, S Jiang3, C Kim4
Keywords: 0492, Charles Kim Adjacent Metallic Instrumentation Does Not Limit Bone Ablation When Using a Bipolar RFA Device Adjacent Metallic Instrumentation Does Not Li
Poster number: 492
Category: Interventional Oncology: Ablation
Authors: A Sag1, W Sperduto2, W Eward3, J Ronald3, H Davis3, S Jiang3, C Kim4
Keywords: 0492, Charles Kim Adjacent Metallic Instrumentation Does Not Limit Bone Ablation When Using a Bipolar RFA Device Adjacent Metallic Instrumentation Does Not Li
Poster Title: Adjacent Metallic Instrumentation Does Not Limit Bone Ablation When Using a Bipolar RFA Device
Poster number: 492
Category: Interventional Oncology: Ablation
Authors: A Sag1, W Sperduto2, W Eward3, J Ronald3, H Davis3, S Jiang3, C Kim4
Keywords: 0492, Charles Kim Adjacent Metallic Instrumentation Does Not Limit Bone Ablation When Using a Bipolar RFA Device Adjacent Metallic Instrumentation Does Not Li
Poster number: 492
Category: Interventional Oncology: Ablation
Authors: A Sag1, W Sperduto2, W Eward3, J Ronald3, H Davis3, S Jiang3, C Kim4
Keywords: 0492, Charles Kim Adjacent Metallic Instrumentation Does Not Limit Bone Ablation When Using a Bipolar RFA Device Adjacent Metallic Instrumentation Does Not Li
Code of conduct/disclaimer available in General Terms & Conditions
{{ help_message }}
{{filter}}