SIR ePoster Library

Superior Hypogastric Nerve Block in Uterine Fibroid Embolization Patients with Radial Artery Entry: Vascular Considerations, Anesthetic Choices, and Rescue Options
SIR ePoster library. Yarosh C. 03/04/17; 170105; 674
Carlyn Yarosh
Carlyn Yarosh
Login now to access Regular content available to all registered users.
Abstract
Rate & Comment (0)

Final ID
674

Type
Educational Exhibit-Poster Only

Authors
C Yarosh1, C Hoffman1, E Boyd1, W Koh2, G Kim1, S Chaabane1, P Kay1, J Jahr1

Institutions
1UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 2Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Yeongnam

Purpose
1. Review radiological anatomy, aortic and iliocaval bifurcations, in relation to the L4-S1 vertebral bodies2. Review important properties of anesthetics used: ropivacaine vs. bupivacaine 3. Review rescue options, such as intravenous lipid emulsion, in the event of an unintentional intravascular injection

Materials & Methods
For the last 20 years, uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) has been a successful treatment option for women with symptomatic fibroids and adenomyosis. Adequately treating the patient's pain and nausea is a continuing challenge. Recently, superior hypogastric nerve block (SHNB) has been revisited as a successful adjunct technique for decreasing pain post-embolization. This form of regional anesthesia has been found to be effective.(1) Previous studies on SHNB are based on a femoral approach and fluoroscopic evaluation of the aortic bifurcation. As we transition to radial access, this guidance is not available.

Results
MRI images are readily available in UFE patients, as this study is usually performed prior to UFE. We will examine the location of vascular structures relative to the mid-to-inferior L5 vertebral body, the typical target for SHNB, so that these vessels can be avoided.(2) Selection of the optimum anesthetic choice (ropivacaine versus bupivacaine) and rescue options, such as administration of intravenous lipid emulsion in the case of unintentional intravenous injection, will be discussed.(3)

Conclusions
With understanding of the varying anatomic locations of the aortic and iliocaval bifurcations and pre-procedure evaluation of the patient's MRI images, intravenous anesthetic injection can be avoided during SHNB administration. Additionally, having intravenous lipid emulsion and standard resuscitation methods on hand in case of unintentional intravenous anesthetic injection makes SHNB a low-risk pain control method that can improve the postoperative experience of UFE patients.

Final ID
674

Type
Educational Exhibit-Poster Only

Authors
C Yarosh1, C Hoffman1, E Boyd1, W Koh2, G Kim1, S Chaabane1, P Kay1, J Jahr1

Institutions
1UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 2Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Yeongnam

Purpose
1. Review radiological anatomy, aortic and iliocaval bifurcations, in relation to the L4-S1 vertebral bodies2. Review important properties of anesthetics used: ropivacaine vs. bupivacaine 3. Review rescue options, such as intravenous lipid emulsion, in the event of an unintentional intravascular injection

Materials & Methods
For the last 20 years, uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) has been a successful treatment option for women with symptomatic fibroids and adenomyosis. Adequately treating the patient's pain and nausea is a continuing challenge. Recently, superior hypogastric nerve block (SHNB) has been revisited as a successful adjunct technique for decreasing pain post-embolization. This form of regional anesthesia has been found to be effective.(1) Previous studies on SHNB are based on a femoral approach and fluoroscopic evaluation of the aortic bifurcation. As we transition to radial access, this guidance is not available.

Results
MRI images are readily available in UFE patients, as this study is usually performed prior to UFE. We will examine the location of vascular structures relative to the mid-to-inferior L5 vertebral body, the typical target for SHNB, so that these vessels can be avoided.(2) Selection of the optimum anesthetic choice (ropivacaine versus bupivacaine) and rescue options, such as administration of intravenous lipid emulsion in the case of unintentional intravenous injection, will be discussed.(3)

Conclusions
With understanding of the varying anatomic locations of the aortic and iliocaval bifurcations and pre-procedure evaluation of the patient's MRI images, intravenous anesthetic injection can be avoided during SHNB administration. Additionally, having intravenous lipid emulsion and standard resuscitation methods on hand in case of unintentional intravenous anesthetic injection makes SHNB a low-risk pain control method that can improve the postoperative experience of UFE patients.

Code of conduct/disclaimer available in General Terms & Conditions

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies